Why shouldn’t acts of plagiarism committed online be preserved online for study and enlightenment? Publishers don’t attempt to collect and destroy the newspapers, magazines or books they sell if they are later found to contain works of plagiarism. Nor do the copyright cops invade libraries to snip from the newspaper microfilm rolls the frames that are later discovered to have contained plagiarized material. We’ve wisely agreed that instances of print plagiarism should be preserved for study and for re-judgment in case the accused is innocent – and yes, also for fingerpointing.
Opinion by Jack Shafer: “When editors bury that which cannot die”

23 Notes/ Hide

  1. sole-aesthetic reblogged this from reuters
  2. jenconnic reblogged this from reuters
  3. debmarkham reblogged this from reuters
  4. flongafack reblogged this from reuters
  5. imagimelon reblogged this from reuters
  6. vsquaredk reblogged this from reuters
  7. reuters posted this