Court rules against FCC in TV profanity, nudity cases
The high court’s unanimous ruling, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, declared the Federal Communication Commission’s standards vague as applied to the specific broadcasts in the case, but it did not decide the larger question of whether the indecency policy violated constitutional free-speech rights.
21 Notes/ Hide
-
seanmonster likes this
-
lolcalnews reblogged this from reuters
-
lolcalnews likes this
-
newsfloozie reblogged this from reuters
-
aged-canine reblogged this from reuters
-
keanuquotes likes this
-
horridlittlegames likes this
-
ca-thar-si-s likes this
-
dalekhuman reblogged this from abaldwin360 and added:
Yay!
-
trotskitty reblogged this from abaldwin360
-
betthearm reblogged this from reuters
-
breakthrough-by-design reblogged this from america-wakiewakie
-
matsurisunrise likes this
-
america-wakiewakie reblogged this from abaldwin360
-
lifeincommas reblogged this from reuters and added:
Well this is interesting. Curious to see what it’ll mean.
-
america-wakiewakie likes this
-
noahmanskar reblogged this from reuters and added:
YES YES YES YES YES I’ve been waiting for this decision since fucking DECEMBER this means the 10 page research paper and...
-
troy-and-abed-now-on-tummmmblr reblogged this from abaldwin360
-
abaldwin360 reblogged this from reuters
-
hemi-powereddrone reblogged this from reuters
-
reuters posted this
